“Unnamed party” funding Tongasat unlikely to pay costs if it loses appeal, Lord Chief Justice says; orders security deposit

Kuo tu'utu'uni 'a e fakamaau lahi' ke totongi malu'i 'e he Tongasat ha pa'anga $15,,000 ki he fakamaau'anga' ki mu'a pea toki lava ke hoko atu 'enau tangi'. Ko e tangi 'eni 'a e kautaha satelaite ne fokotu'u 'e Pilinisesi Pilolevu' hili ha tu'utu'uni 'a e fakamaau lahi' he ta'u kuo 'osi' na'e ta'efakalao hono 'ave 'o e pa'anga 'e $90 miliona mei Siaina na'e taumu'a mai ki he fonua' mo e pule'anga' ki he kautaha Tongasat. Pehē 'e he fakamāu' 'oku mo'oni 'a 'Akilisi Pōhiva kapau 'e iku e tangi' 'o toe fo'i 'a e Tongasat pea 'e malava ke kalo 'a e kautaha kuo 'ikai fakahā hono hingoa' 'o pehē ko kinautolu ne nau fakapa'anga e tangi ko 'eni 'a e Tongasat, 'i hano 'eke atu ke nau totongi e fakamole 'o e hopo'.

An unnamed party was standing behind Tongasat and funding its appeal against a ruling that the transfer of nearly US$50 million to the company was illegal, the Supreme Court has been told.

Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said he inferred this from the evidence placed before him and was one of the factors in ordering Tongasat to pay a TP$15,000 security deposit into the court before its latest appeal could be dealt with.

He said there was a significant risk that if costs were awarded against Tongasat they would not be paid.

Prime Minister ‘Akilisi Pohiva, who began the long running legal battle with Tongasat when he was leader of the opposition, asked the Supreme Court to rule that Tongasat must put a TP$15,000 security deposit.

Tongasat has applied for permission to call for evidence from four witnesses and said if this was granted it would seek a re-trial.

Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said the case would come before him again on May 3.

By then he would have ruled on Tongasat’s request to call further evidence.

As Kaniva Tonga news reported at the time, in August and September last year the Supreme Court ruled the transfer of US$49.9 million to Princess Pilolevu’s company was illegal.

Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said Tongasat’s appeal was really an attempt to secure a new trial.

 “Tongasat has  already had its case heard and adjudicated upon after a lengthy trial before the Supreme Court,” the judge said.

“In addition, the appellant has benefited by the impugned transactions, received a very large sum of grant aid funds and has divested itself of those funds in their entirety.

“It has commercial interests at stake in this litigation.”

In his evidence to the supreme court, Hon. Pohiva said Tongasat was “an effective shell…an insolvent and worthless company.”

He said the company had a history of refusing to honour court orders for costs made against it.

“I seek an order staying pursuit by Tongasat of all aspects of its appeal until it has provided security for my costs,” Hon. Pohiva said.

He said that based on the evidence, Tongasat had long since been stripped by Princess Pilolevu of all significant financial assets, including Tongasat’s share of the first and second tranche payments.

He said the company’s outside backer would be unlikely to pay costs should a ruling go against Tongasat.

Judge Paulsen said Tongasat’s financial condition appeared to be “parlous” and there was good reason to believe that the appellant would not be  in  a position to pay costs on this appeal should it be required to do  so.

The Court therefore ordered Tongasat to pay TP$15,000 to the court as security by March 15.

If the money is not paid Tongasat’s application to overturn the ruling will be put on hold.

Unlawful

Last week we reported that former Minister of Finance Sūnia Fili, who leaked the news of the unlawful transfer of Chinese money to Princess Pilolevu and her satellite company, has now claimed part of the money was intended for Tongasat.

Fili said while he was Minister of Finance he was given an agreement document which said the government of Tonga and Tongasat had agreed to split the TP$90 million 50 percent each after deducting taxes.

The main points

  • An unnamed party was standing behind Tongasat and funding its appeal against a ruling that the transfer of nearly US$50 million to the company was illegal, the Supreme Court has been told.
  • Lord Chief Justice Paulsen said he inferred this from the evidence placed before him and was one of the factors in ordering Tongasat to pay a TP$15,000 security deposit into the court before its latest appeal  could be dealt with.
  • He said there was a significant risk that if costs were awarded against Tongasat they would not be paid.

For more information

Supreme Court issues declaration on legal status of main points in Tongasat case

About The Author

Sometimes when a business is growing, it needs a little help.

Right now Kaniva News provides a free, politically independent, bilingual news service for readers around the world that is absolutely unique. We are the largest New Zealand-based Tongan news service, and our stories reach Tongans  wherever they are round the world. But as we grow, there are increased demands on Kaniva News for translation into Tongan on our social media accounts and for the costs associated with expansion. We believe it is important for Tongans to have their own voice and for Tongans to preserve their language, customs and heritage. That is something to which we are strongly committed. That’s why we are asking you to consider sponsoring our work and helping to preserve a uniquely Tongan point of view for our readers and listeners.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Latest news

Related news